[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: FW: Issues to be closed at the Sept 4 Concall
Forwarded on behalf of Eve Mahler (she is the victim of email conspiricy gremlins ;-) At 10:40 AM 8/30/01 -0400, Hal Lockhart wrote: >As promised, the attached document lists the open issues I believe should be >closed immediately. Anyone who disagrees about any of them should post to >the list. The current plan is to close all of them by a single vote at the >TC Concall on Sept 4. I'd like us to reconsider the following issue: DS-4-05: SingleSchema I may have missed any discussion of the rationale for having one vs. two schemas. Understanding that assertions can be used entirely without the request/response layer in some scenarios, I'm willing to believe that two is the right answer, but I'd like us to document our rationale because there are costs to having two namespace names, defining things like majorVersion and minorVersion twice, etc. Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC