RE: Substitution Groups Reconsidered

["PATO,JOE (HP-PaloAlto,ex1)" <joe_pato@hp.com>]

Eve,

It will be very good to capture this rationale in your document. Thanks.

- joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 6:35 PM
To: security-services@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: Substitution Groups Reconsidered


<snip>

Phill and 
I did agree that it's a good idea to have some non-normative text somewhere 
explaining the benefits and costs of different extension approaches 
(substitution group vs. xsi:type).  Perhaps this is something I can add to 
my proposed schema design rationale document.