[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [Action - Prateek]: Should the Bindings Group select either t he HTTP or SOAP protocol bindings?
You are absolutely right, I am clearly not drinking enough coffee in the AM. >> >>Uh, shouldn't that be >> >> (1) Do we require BOTH a HTTP binding and a SOAP binding in SAML 1.0? >> ^^^^ >> - RL "Bob" >> Here is what I intended to say: One part of the discussions at f2f#4 concerned the following: (1) Do we require BOTH a HTTP binding and a SOAP binding in SAML 1.0? RESPOND: Yes/No (2a) If yes, which binding is going to be Mandatory-to-Implement? RESPOND: HTTP/SOAP 1.1 (2b) If no, which binding is of interest to you? RESPOND: HTTP/SOAP 1.1/another proposal ___________________ My votes: (1) No (2b) SOAP 1.1 with some sanity restrictions concerning the use of intermediates (see related message). SOAP/HTTP would be called out in full detail and would be mandatory-to-implement.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC