security-services message

Subject: RE: Bindings Committee Recommendation: SAML HTTP Binding should b e mandatory-to-implement

From: Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com>
To: 'David Orchard' <david.orchard@bea.com>,"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com>,"'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'"<security-services@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 10:32:58 -0400

> BEA strongly believes in option #2, and will vote that way if 
> asked.  This 
> is not a marketing "buzz" but real need.

I am also inclined towards #2, but I would like to hear your reasons. Since
the Binding has only to do with the exchange of SAML requests and responses
between SAML-aware parties, it can not be a need for interoperability with
existing SOAP applications.

Hal