RE: [security-services] proposed "committee last call" process

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

My thoughts as well. Or as they say now-a-days +1 :o)

cheers

 | -----Original Message-----
 | From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu]
 | Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:00 AM
 | To: 'oasis sstc'
 | Subject: RE: [security-services] proposed "committee last call" process
 | 
 | 
 | > We need to get a fix on the status of the 
 | > DSIG profile. 
 | > 
 | > Krishna, any thoughts on when we can get a revised version 
 | > consistent with F2F#5. Where should this document live? Is it 
 | > part of bindings or core or is it standalone?
 | 
 | FWIW, I think it's clearly part of core, since the signature element
 | shows up in the schemas and its use can be described independently of
 | any particularly profile or binding.
 | 
 | If used by a profile (eg. Browser POST), the profile should be able to
 | briefly reference the relevant section in core that fully describes the
 | usage, and just indicate that it must be used.
 | 
 | -- Scott
 | 
 | 
 | ----------------------------------------------------------------
 | To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
 | manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
 |