[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] FW: Attribute Authority info in AuthenticationAssertion proposal (f2f #5 action item)
>All authorities pointed to by the AuthorityBinding list must be queried by >the relying party. FWIW, Shibboleth is currently defining simpler semantics of equivalence that tell the relying party to query any of them rather than all of them. This sidesteps more complex questions about conflicting attribute responses. For myself, I favor Simon's proposal, modified in this fashion, as a starting point toward a more dynamically interoperable model. I understand the provisioning argument, but I don't see why passing information dynamically isn't preferable to not, even if it doesn't get you all the way there. This doesn't seem like a kitchen sink thing to me. We can use Advice, I just don't think it's as good a solution. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC