[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] editorial comments on bindings-08
At 02:37 PM 1/8/02 -0500, Mishra, Prateek wrote: >1. "SOAP Profile for SAML" vs. "SOAP Profile of SAML" > >Do folks have a preference? Different versions have ping-ponged between the >two phrases. I don't care. When I did editorial stuff on the bindings doc, I just picked the first one that occurred and tried to standardize on it. I may have missed some (but I did check back with the bindings doc when working on references to profiles in other specs!). >2. Section 2.1 mandates the provision of a URI and e-mail address for each >binding and >profile. This is currently missing in the text and needs to be added to the >binding >and each Profile. The intent here is that the URI provides an unambiguous >way to >reference a binding/profile. This is specially useful, if and when, there >are a larger number >of published bindings and profiles. The URI issue is perhaps trickier than it sounds. You should probably use the URI for the specific bindings-0n doc, rather than the overall TC website, so that the version of the profile gets locked down. > The relevant e-mail address for the "official bindings" >and profiles would seem to be the OASIS SSTC mailing list (the e-mail >address for comments >on the documents as a whole). This would ensure that issues discovered >during >deployment and implementation, as well as any new requirements for >individual bindings/profiles >have a home. You mean security-services-comment, right? Outsiders can't post to the regular TC list. Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC