RE: [security-services] A "final" proposal on status codes

[Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

>I think it is better to use samlp:Requestor and samlp:Responder in
>samlp:StatusCodeEnumType definition rather
>than samlp:Sender and samlp:Receiver. Also, we can also refer to 'saml
>requestor' and 'saml responder' in the descriptive text. 

The terminology was also copied from SOAP, but SAML probably fits the
Request/Response assumption moreso than SOAP does, since there's no
current use for Status apart from inside a Response.

-- Scott