[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] comments on core-25
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > Again, comments only on the substantive issues: > > > > *369 says "One or more of ", but the schema at 386 specifies > > minOccurs="0" > > Do we want to have zero statements in an assertion? I suspect not > so I removed the minOccurs. Why does it matter if there are zero statements in an assertion? Shouldn't there be suitable consistent semantics to handle that case? -Polar
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC