[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Following up on dateTime
>If it is always a positive or negative offset from UTC I guess that is ok, >but I wonder how many libraries will correctly handle offsets that are not >an interger multiple of 1 hour. I can't say, but the format is described in [1] and mandates an offset be a +/- followed by HH:MM As I said, I have no problem requiring UTC at all, I'm just not sure using xsd:dateTime with a bunch of MUSTs in the text is the "right" way to accomplish that. -- Scott [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#dateTime
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC