[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] ISSUE: Fragment identifiers for URI references on the Format attribute
It's not bad per se, but a URI-aware interpretation of it (as vaguely called for by our spec) would, I believe, get you different results than treating it like a mere string. I think this means that our spec is underspecified and has an interoperability hole. Eve Mishra, Prateek wrote: > Eve, > > looking through our code, I find that > all we do is treat the fragment identifiers as strings: > #emailAddress etc. > > Is this bad? I guess the problem is that they may also > validly be complete URLs. > > - prateek -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 883 5917 XML Web Services / Industry Initiatives eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC