[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ISSUE: <StatusCode> a "root" element?
In reviewing the bindings doc for typographical inconsistencies in the treatment of status code stuff, I found this in Section 3.1.3.6 Error Reporting: "In the case of a SAML processing error, the SOAP HTTP server MUST respond with "200 OK" and include a SAML-specified error description as the only child of the <SOAP-ENV:Body> element." Yikes. Should we be putting MajorVersion etc. attributes on StatusCode along with Assertion, Request, and Response? If we did, we'd want to make them optional, with default values inherited from the nearest SAML ancestor, if any. Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]