[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Question on PE6 (artifact confirmation methods)
I guess we should clear this up in the meeting on Tuesday to make sure I get it right, and I'll hold off on trying to implement it until core-05. Eve Jahan Moreh wrote: > Eve - > I *think* you are reading this correctly in that we decide to have a generic > identifier for artifact confirmation method. However, I defer to Rob as he > is the originator of this item.... > > Jahan >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 5:41 PM >>To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org' >>Subject: [security-services] Question on PE6 (artifact confirmation >>methods) >> >> >>I'm working my way through the Bindings and Profiles changes now. The >>disposition for PE6 in the errata document says: >> >>"Add a confirmation method ID (artifact) and indicate that either one >>can be used for 01, 03, or any other future." >> >>I couldn't quite parse this and couldn't recall the discussion on >>February 18 that led to it. Nor were the minutes particularly helpful. >> I think I'm supposed to add a section for a generic artifact >>confirmation method, urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:cm:artifact, and >>explain that either it or the -01 version can be used. But I don't >>understand the "01, 03, or any other future" part. I would have thought >>that we would deprecate and plan to phase out the numbered version >>eventually. ? >> >>Also, I'm not sure we answered the other question in the erratum, which >>says "We should also be explicit as to whether providing the actual >>artifact in the ConfirmationData is required, optional, or not permitted >>- Which is it?" >> >> Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]