[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] PE9 - Proposed replacement text:
In theory I'm good with this wording, but it brings into question our decision on E8 last week, where I pointed out that the current <RespondWith> wording asks for the QName of an element when the desired statement is native, but asks for the QName of a type when the desired statement is foreign. I think if we change the original meaning, it's backwards-incompatible. Eve Philpott, Robert wrote: > Here is the suggested replacement text for PE9. in -core-01 this > replaces lines 968-970. In draft-04, it replaces lines 981-983 (of the > word document with markup display turned on). > > > > Original: > > <RespondWith> element values are XML QNames. The XML namespace and name > specifically refer to the namespace and element name of the Statement > element, exactly as for the saml:AuthorityKind attribute; see Section > 2.4.3.2. For example, a requester that wishes to receive assertions > containing only > > > > Proposed: > > <RespondWith> element values are XML QNames. The XML namespace and name > specifically refer to the namespace and element name of the <Statement> > element that must be present in the assertion provided in the response > to the request. The acceptable values for the <RespondWith> element are > the namespace-qualified names of elements from or elements derived from > the SAML Assertion <Statement> element (see Section 2.4.1). For example, > a requester that wishes to receive assertions containing only > > *Rob Philpott* > *RSA Security Inc.* > /The Most Trusted Name in e-Security/ > *Tel: 781-515-7115* > *Mobile**: 617-510-0893* > *Fax: 781-515-7020* > mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com > > > -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]