[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] LA 1.1, SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0
"Mishra, Prateek" wrote: > > Colleagues, > > As you are aware we had voted to request from LA permission to create > specifications that utilized the LA 1.1 specification set as part of SAML > 2.0. > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200303/msg00029.html > > Subsequently, we have received from LA a statement that grants us such > rights. > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200304/msg00072.html > > The SSTC has also been engaged in creating SAML 1.1. There are several > different components to SAML 1.1 in progress which can be placed in one of > two buckets: > > (1) Corrections, clarifications and advice on use of SAML 1.0 > specifications. > > (2) Additions to SAML 1.0 > > Category (2) includes two work items that also appear in LA 1.1: > > (A) "Destination-Site First" web browser profile > (B) (Web Browser Profile)/General Meta-data Specification > > I would like to propose for DISCUSSION the idea that in the current > circumstances we should avoid including Category (2) items in SAML 1.1. Why? ^ just those two (A,B) ? > Because we are in a situation where we will end up having to revisit these > issues in SAML 2.0. There will also be confusion in the field as SAML 1.1 > features and SAML 2.0 features will be seen as colliding. > > My suggestion would be to create draft specifications in this category, > which we would then submit into the SAML 2.0 mix. This would also ensure > that all the effort that went into them was carried forward appropriately. thanks, JeffH
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]