FW: DoNotCacheCondition and effect on sec-consider

["Philpott, Robert" <rphilpott@rsasecurity.com>]

I was just going though some old mail and found this note from Eve which we
have not addressed.

Is there a volunteer out there that will look at this ASAP and propose some
text changes that we can discuss on the call tomorrow?  

I'll take care of the editorial updates once approved.

Thanks!

Rob Philpott 
RSA Security Inc. 
The Most Trusted Name in e-Security 
Tel: 781-515-7115 
Mobile: 617-510-0893 
Fax: 781-515-7020 
mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 4:25 PM
To: 'Prateek Mishra (pmishra@netegrity.com)'; Philpott, Robert
Subject: DoNotCacheCondition and effect on sec-consider

I'm just now getting to my sec-consider edits, and among the minor 
copyedits, I found a note I made during my train ride about DoNotCache. 
  If we do put this in (for last call or for Ctte Spec), we should 
remember that it affects not only the schema and core, but also Section 
5.1 of sec-consider.  Currently in that section, it says that there are 
few security considerations regarding assertions per se, but I believe 
that it should mention validity intervals, as well as (if we add it) 
DoNotCache.

This is one of those things I will not have time to do, even if it's 
considered a minor editorial thing.  So I wanted you guys to get it on 
your post-LC lists, if you care...

Thanks!

	Eve

-- 
Eve Maler                                        +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems                            cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Technologies and Standards               eve.maler @ sun.com