[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Editorial topics that need discussion
May I suggest a SAML Primer as a separate document ? -k. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jahan Moreh [mailto:jmoreh@sigaba.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:16 AM > To: Eve L. Maler; oasis sstc (E-mail) > > Eve - > > - Ease-of-use content. I've suggested that we desperately > need examples > > in the core spec, and others have suggested that we produce > a tutorial. > > What do people think is the best way to deliver this sort > of stuff: an > > examples appendix, examples interspersed among the normative bits, a > > separate tutorial with examples, all of the above, ...? Are there > > materials out there that we could use as a basis? > I personally like examples that are interspersed with among > normative bits. > If all the examples are coherently related to each other, > then we can have > an appendix that pulls together all the examples into some > number (1-5) of > complete examples (i.e., request/response, authN, authZ, > attributes, etc.). > > Jahan > > ---------------- > Jahan Moreh > Chief Security Architect > 310.286.3070 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:32 AM > > To: oasis sstc (E-mail) > > Subject: [security-services] Editorial topics that need discussion > > > > > > The editorial folks have been bouncing around a few ideas, > and I wanted > > to bring them to the whole TC for discussion. (Should > these be added > > explicitly to the work items document? That document is > feeling almost > > like an issues list now...) Perhaps we could spend a few minutes on > > each at the next meeting. > > > > - Bindings/profiles spec reorganization. We have talked > before about > > versioning implications of individual profiles. I think it would be > > more elegant, versioning-wise, to put the instructional > material about > > "what constitutes a profile" in the core spec, and then > have individual > > specs for each profile or set of related profiles. If > we're going to be > > adding bindings, we might want to do the same thing with > them. Another > > consideration is the breakdown of Liberty specs; Jeff > pointed out that > > we might want to follow that lead. But he also pointed out another > > consideration: speed of V2.0 vs. undertaking a huge reorg. > We'll need > > to discuss the speed factor as part of our goal statement > discussion, > > methinks, and that will help to guide the editorial choices. > > > > - Ease-of-use content. I've suggested that we desperately > need examples > > in the core spec, and others have suggested that we produce > a tutorial. > > What do people think is the best way to deliver this sort > of stuff: an > > examples appendix, examples interspersed among the normative bits, a > > separate tutorial with examples, all of the above, ...? Are there > > materials out there that we could use as a basis? > > > > Eve > > -- > > Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 > > Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 > > Web Products, Technologies, and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com > > > ********************************************************************** > > SunNetwork 2003 Conference and Pavilion > http://www.sun.com/sunnetwork > > September 16-18, 2003 Moscone Center, > San Francisco > > An unparalleled event in network computing! Make the net > work for you! > > > > > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/mem > bers/leave_workgroup.php > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services > /members/leave_workgroup.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]