Re: [security-services] goal statement thread

["Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>]

Yeah, I put the V1.2 part in brackets because I didn't know if it was 
appropriate to put out a formal goal statement that mentions something 
that's as yet unsubmitted.  How about this sleight-of-hand?

"This support will be based on the ID-FF specifications contributed by 
the Liberty Alliance to the TC."

Let's see if we can get TC agreement on this whole statement at the next 
telecon.

	Eve

Mishra, Prateek wrote:

> Eve,
> 
> Your re-spin works for me except for:
> 
> This support will be based on the Liberty 
> 
>>>Alliance ID-FF 
>>>V1.1 [and V1.2?] specifications that were contributed to the TC.
> 
> 
> I believe this should read ID-FF V1.1 and V1.2 specifications. The former
> has been submitted to the TC and the latter has been requested from the
> Liberty Alliance Organization.
-- 
Eve Maler                                        +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems                            cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Products, Technologies, and Standards    eve.maler @ sun.com
**********************************************************************
SunNetwork 2003 Conference and Pavilion  http://www.sun.com/sunnetwork
September 16-18, 2003                    Moscone Center, San Francisco
An unparalleled event in network computing! Make the net work for you!