[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Groups - liberty-architecture-overview-v1 .1.pdfuploaded
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com>
10/18/2003 03:34 PM |
To: Michael McIntosh/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> cc: "'Jeff.Hodges@sun.com '" <Jeff.Hodges@sun.com>, "'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org '" <security-services@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: RE: [security-services] Groups - liberty-architecture-overview-v1 .1.pdf uploaded |
Hi Prateek,
Thanks for sending this, I missed it before. It appears that this unsigned
email message comes from several OASIS SS TC members who also happen to
be LA members. Has the TC received any definitive statements directly from
the LA Board?
<Prateek>
This is a matter of public record. Please see:
http://www.projectliberty.org/press/releases/2003-04-11.html
The formal SSTC minutes of Aprl 15, 2003 describes the submission and acceptance of the contribution.
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200304/msg00128.html
</Prateek>
Also, even if this submission has received the LA Board's approval it remains
unclear whether it meets the conditions for submission under OASIS. There
are several specific conditions required for submission to OASIS that do
not appear to have been addressed by the email message. Please see: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php
<Prateek>
I am sorry I do not follow this line of reasoning. What are the specific conditions that have not been met? To my knowledge all of the conditions in http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php are met by the submissions. Could you please point to the specific portions (section numbers, text) of http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php that you believe have been violated?
</Prateek>
Has the OASIS Board made it's position clear on this specific set of documents?
I suggest that any relevant statements related to IPR be collocated with
the documents in the archive.
<Prateek>
I am sorry I do not understand your question. The SSTC is an autonomous group that functions under the rules given in http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php. Are you suggesting that the OASIS board must give an opinion on day-to-day TC decisions?
</Prateek>
Thanks,
Mike
"Mishra, Prateek"
<pmishra@netegrity.com>
10/17/2003 09:31 PM | To: Michael McIntosh/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "'Jeff.Hodges@sun.com '" <Jeff.Hodges@sun.com> cc: "'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org '" <security-services@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: RE: [security-services] Groups - liberty-architecture-overview-v1 .1.pdf uploaded |
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200304/msg00072.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael McIntosh
To: Jeff.Hodges@sun.com
Cc: security-services@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: 10/17/2003 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: [security-services] Groups -
liberty-architecture-overview-v1.1.pdf uploaded
Can someone please show me where this TC has been given the rights to
prepare derivative works or reproduce portions of this document?
This document explicitly forbids these actions.
Thanks,
Mike
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]