RE: [security-services] Interest in SAML Interop week of February 23?

["John Hughes" <john.hughes@entegrity.com>]

Entegrity would like to participate.


John



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philpott, Robert [mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com]
> Sent: 10 November 2003 21:09
> To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'
> Subject: [security-services] Interest in SAML Interop week of February
> 23?
>
>
> Resending the message with a more appropriate subject...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philpott, Robert
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 4:03 PM
> To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'
> Subject: RE: [security-services] Comment on SAML implementations and their
> inter-op properties
>
> Definitely timely.
>
> There have been occasional discussions about the need for another interop
> along the lines of Burton Catalyst 2002.  Well, I'd like to gauge how much
> interest there would be in possibly holding such an even at the 2004 RSA
> Conference during the week of Feb 23 in San Francisco.
>
> I think this should line up pretty well for most vendors since from what I
> understand, most will have V1.1 implementations available by the
> end of this
> year or Q1.
>
> If your company or organization would possibly be interested,
> please respond
> to the list and we'll try to kick something off.  As everyone knows, the
> devils in the details when it comes to these events and it will take some
> good coordination and planning.
>
> But I definitely think it's worth doing and the timing seems about right.
>
> Rob Philpott
> RSA Security Inc.
> The Most Trusted Name in e-Security
> Tel: 781-515-7115
> Mobile: 617-510-0893
> Fax: 781-515-7020
> mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com]
> > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 1:58 PM
> > To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'
> > Subject: Re: [security-services] Comment on SAML
> implementations and their
> > inter-op properties
> >
> > Interesting and timely feedback.
> >
> > The issue of working on a test suite came up in the September meeting,
> > but we didn't get very far with it.  Perhaps we should see if Daniel
> > Blum's exhortation makes it more attractive for some SAML participants
> > to take on this resource-intensive task.  At the least, should we be
> > planning additional interop events for various scenarios?
> >
> > Regarding having a a "must-implement profile": This seems a little weird
> > to me if you look at the entire range of possible and existing profiles,
> > though if we couched it in terms like "*If you're doing SSO*, you must
> > support XYZ profile" it would make more sense.  We discussed this idea
> > very early on; maybe it's time to revisit it.
> >
> > Regarding "cookbook" material, we are indeed creating more outreach
> > materials, including executive and technical overviews and the FAQ.
> > Maybe we (John Hughes and I?) should contact Daniel about this and offer
> > the opportunity to review and make suggestions.
> >
> > 	Eve
> >
> > Mishra, Prateek wrote:
> >
> > > http://burtongroup.com/weblogs/danielblum/
> > >
> > > - prateek
> > >
> > > Prateek Mishra
> > > Director, Tech&Arch
> > > Netegrity
> > >
> > > p: 781-530-6564
> > > c: 617-875-4970
> > --
> > Eve Maler                                        +1 781 442 3190
> > Sun Microsystems                            cell +1 781 354 9441
> > Web Products, Technologies, and Standards    eve.maler @ sun.com
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
> > the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-
> >
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the
> roster of the
> OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/mem
bers/leave
_workgroup.php.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/members/leave
_workgroup.php.