[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Interest in SAML Interop week of February 23?
Trustgenix is interested in participating. -Greg On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 10:09 PM, Philpott, Robert wrote: > Resending the message with a more appropriate subject... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Philpott, Robert > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 4:03 PM > To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org' > Subject: RE: [security-services] Comment on SAML implementations and > their > inter-op properties > > Definitely timely. > > There have been occasional discussions about the need for another > interop > along the lines of Burton Catalyst 2002. Well, I'd like to gauge how > much > interest there would be in possibly holding such an even at the 2004 RSA > Conference during the week of Feb 23 in San Francisco. > > I think this should line up pretty well for most vendors since from > what I > understand, most will have V1.1 implementations available by the end of > this > year or Q1. > > If your company or organization would possibly be interested, please > respond > to the list and we'll try to kick something off. As everyone knows, the > devils in the details when it comes to these events and it will take > some > good coordination and planning. > > But I definitely think it's worth doing and the timing seems about > right. > > Rob Philpott > RSA Security Inc. > The Most Trusted Name in e-Security > Tel: 781-515-7115 > Mobile: 617-510-0893 > Fax: 781-515-7020 > mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com] >> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 1:58 PM >> To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org' >> Subject: Re: [security-services] Comment on SAML implementations and >> their >> inter-op properties >> >> Interesting and timely feedback. >> >> The issue of working on a test suite came up in the September meeting, >> but we didn't get very far with it. Perhaps we should see if Daniel >> Blum's exhortation makes it more attractive for some SAML participants >> to take on this resource-intensive task. At the least, should we be >> planning additional interop events for various scenarios? >> >> Regarding having a a "must-implement profile": This seems a little >> weird >> to me if you look at the entire range of possible and existing >> profiles, >> though if we couched it in terms like "*If you're doing SSO*, you must >> support XYZ profile" it would make more sense. We discussed this idea >> very early on; maybe it's time to revisit it. >> >> Regarding "cookbook" material, we are indeed creating more outreach >> materials, including executive and technical overviews and the FAQ. >> Maybe we (John Hughes and I?) should contact Daniel about this and >> offer >> the opportunity to review and make suggestions. >> >> Eve >> >> Mishra, Prateek wrote: >> >>> http://burtongroup.com/weblogs/danielblum/ >>> >>> - prateek >>> >>> Prateek Mishra >>> Director, Tech&Arch >>> Netegrity >>> >>> p: 781-530-6564 >>> c: 617-875-4970 >> -- >> Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 >> Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 >> Web Products, Technologies, and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster >> of >> the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis- >> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security- >> services/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster > of the > OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security- > services/members/leave > _workgroup.php. > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster > of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis- > open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security- > services/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]