RE: [security-services] RE: IBM charter position (was [security-services] Groups- sstc-saml-charter-2.0-draft-02.doc uploaded)

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>]

Conor,

>3) The adoption of the SSO portion of the Liberty specifications without
>the federation portions (assuming this is true, I haven't seen any
>public announcements of such adoptions) flies in the face of your
>concern about SAML generating a "monolithic" specification.  Clearly the
>SSO mechanisms are separate and distinct from the federation mechanisms.

Have no clue what you are saying can you be more clear ?

Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122