[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] RE: IBM charter position (was[security-services] Groups - sstc-saml-charter-2.0-draft-02.doc uploaded)
> >That's why they're appropriately separate work items in the scope > >document. > > Thanks for the clarification as this is what I was tying to > point out with the charter updates. Well, saying they're separate work items and saying one is in scope and one isn't are two different things. I agree with the former, but not with the latter. We can debate and discuss exactly what the necessary or sufficient use cases might be to make a SAML identity federation component useful (and I expect we will), but that discussion is not inconsistent with the proposed charter, IMHO. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]