[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Liberty IPR Issues (was: Liberty ID-FF 1. 2 submissionto the SSTC)
Anthony Nadalin wrote on 12/3/2003, 8:23 AM: > > its the collective authors statement. Second it does grant the right to > modify (derivative rights) see the grants and commitments section. I did read the document. Please show the wording that you think provides the derivative rights. > "Each Author commits to grant a non sub-licenseable", is what > your saying is that you don't trust the author companies (IBM, > Microsoft and Verisign) ? It's not whether or not I trust the companies, nor whether or not they can be forced to live up to the committment. It is, however, a fact that the statement is NOT a grant. It is a committment for a future action. > If you have further issues on the WSS-TC IPR statement I suggest you > submit them to the WSS-TC. As I have stated here several times, I have absolutely no problems with the WSS-TC IPR statement. My problems are with those that found that statement perfectly acceptable in another venue now asking for much more stringent IPR disclosures in this venue. Conor
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]