[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] wrt SAML artifact definition
Yikes, this is a big change from how we've been using it, though it does hew more closely to the WS-I-ish meaning. Actually, our profiles seem most like "protocols" to me! But I imagine we should stay far away from this. I thought our definitions of "binding" and "profile" were fairly clear and distinct. Agreed that they -- and artifact -- should appear in the Glossary, though. (I will add an issue to the issues list so we don't lose this, regardless of how we define them.) Eve Rich Salz wrote: >>The browser profiles seem like a mix of binding and profile now. The content >>of the messages is a profile, but the rules for exchange seem like a >>binding. > > > So I noticed. :) > > I think the browser profile should really be "browser-oriented binding" > or some such. > > /r$ -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Products, Technologies, and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]