RE: [security-services] saml-metadata draft comments

[Peter C Davis <peter.davis@neustar.biz>]

Yes these comments were derived from the draft. I (wrongfully) assumed
that the schema fragments in the draft represented the schema ;-)

--- peterd

On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 10:59, Scott Cantor wrote:
> > I have a few comments reguarding the metadata spec, to whit:
> 
> Are these comments wrt to the published draft language or the published
> schema?
> 
> > - SPDescriptor drops support for the pulication of multiple
> > assertionconsumerserviceurl. the uses case (from RSA) which supported
> > this design choice, i think, are still quite valid, imho
> 
> I'm guessing the draft, since I includes this in my schema. But I heavily
> revised (and am still evolving) the methodology for documenting endpoints.
> 
> -- Scott