[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Comment on sstc-saml-glossary-2.0 (also c loses AI #0114)
[Paul]> > >Prateek's definition for a federated identity, with its emphasis on an >'identifier', would appear to exclude roles-based scenarios. > >To my mind, if a Principal's role attribute at one provider is >recognizable >and understood at another, this is still a federated identity, albeit >probably anonymous. > >Or, was the intent that 'a class of identifiers' in the >definition addressed >this? > [\Paul] I am also of the opionion that we haven't yet reached solid ground on this issue. It is definitely very important that we include "role-based scenarios" as first-class citizens of the federation ecosystem. It is not clear to me that my proposed definition clearly includes such scenarios. - prateek
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]