[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Core-08 is now available
You're correct - It's a "request" for a protocol message that contains a response message that contains an assertion associated with the specified artifact. "ArtifactResolve" doesn't really work for me either... Rob Philpott Senior Consulting Engineer RSA Security Inc. Tel: 781-515-7115 Mobile: 617-510-0893 Fax: 781-515-7020 mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:19 AM > To: Philpott, Robert; 'John Hughes'; security-services@lists.oasis- > open.org > Subject: RE: [security-services] Core-08 is now available > > > It's unfortunate that ArtifactRequest does sound like a request to > obtain > > an artifact. But it's consistent with the other requests and queries in > > that regard. i.e. an AttributeQuery is a query for an assertion > > with a specified attribute or set of attributes. An ArtifactRequest is a > > request for an assertion associated with the specified artifact. > > My proposal is that it's a request for a protocol message, not an > assertion. > That's a critical distinction. > > But, the name could easily be ArtifactResolve or something more clear. I > didn't worry about the name at the time but I can see why ArtifactRequest > might not be ideal. > > -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]