[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Additional suggestions for naming changes
> Qualifier -> Qual > > I give this one a C grade. It doesn't look that good, and > people don't really elide the "ifier" when they talk. I suppose > "Qualif" is an option, but it doesn't save that much. > > In saml:BaseIDAbstractType: > s/NameQualifier/NameQual/ > s/SPNameQualifier/SPNameQual/ Different suggestion...how about we drop the Name part and just make it Qualifier and SPQualifier. > Reference -> Ref +1, I almost just did it in my edits. If nobody objects, I'll just go ahead and do it in the next draft I'm going to publish. > Confirmation -> Conf I wanted this one, myself. > Condition -> (null) +1 > Attribute -> Attrib or Att Agree with Irving, I would use Attr if anything, but don't think it's a big deal. > Service -> Svc It's used so little, I don't think it matters. > Assertion -> Assn Don't think this is needed. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]