[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] List of possible implementation features for SAML 2.0
This is a case where the profile is "empty": there is nothing more to say beyond the binding. I can add some text explaining the same. It is terminologically pleasant if we can use the same set of terms for all of our features. - prateek -----Original Message----- From: John Hughes [mailto:john.hughes@entegrity.com] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 9:47 AM To: Mishra, Prateek Cc: security-services@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [security-services] List of possible implementation features for SAML 2.0 Prateek, I notice that this has SAML URI Binding as a profile with a HTTP binding. The current documents show that we have SAML URI as a binding - but nothing in the profile document. John > -----Original Message----- > From: Mishra, Prateek [mailto:pmishra@netegrity.com] > Sent: 30 June 2004 22:50 > To: security-services@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [security-services] List of possible implementation features > for SAML 2.0 > > > > Updated with minor edits. > <<ConformanceOptions-01.xls>> > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]