[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Comments on sstc-saml-core-2.0-draft-17.pdf ( long)
John, comments in line: > > We now have both bindings and profiles. I think we need to briefly > discuss the relationship between the two (enough for an implementer to > be able to know roughly how to proceed), and then lead the reader to > [SAML-TechOvw] for more info. > <JohnH> That's great. I've expanded the relevant TechOverview section to include a lot much information on bindings and profiles and their relationship <JohnH> > Note that I mention "affiliation" in there - I don't see any mention of > that concept in [SAML-Core] until we get to the section on NI formats, > so I just want to make sure that the glossary and tech overview have > something about affiliations in there. I don't really see such a great > place to talk specifically about it in [SAML-Core] but that's probably > OK if we have reference to the relevant places. > <JohnH> I will add something in about "affiliations" into the new Federation sections of the TechOverview. I've had a dialog with Scott about how the semantics of "affiliations" are used in SAML 2.0 - given that all the explicit elements concerning them are no there (at they were in ID-FF 1.2) <JohnH> John
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]