[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Stateless Conformity To SAML
> This ties into my earlier note, we would need to make sure > that the schema is accurate wrt conformance. Hitting myself with a brick, I realize I have this wrong, and I also think the metadata is ok anyway because I did it right originally. Metadata reflects a deployment, not an implementation. So obviously, many things (including, say, Logout) are optional in a deployment, and so they're also optional in metadata. Conformance has nothing to do with this. Sorry for the confusion. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]