security-services message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [security-services] Web SSO <AuthnRequest> conformance

From: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: "'Thomas Wisniewski'" <Thomas.Wisniewski@entrust.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:24:06 -0400

> Seems reasonable. Do you feel it will be added to the conf 
> spec as MUST?

I'd be in favor of making POST MTI, and I think we have to do something.

The ability to do artifact was mostly just a consequence of layering the
spec the way I did (i.e. you get it for free architecturally), but there
wasn't overwhelming interest in using it for anything else.

-- Scott

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [security-services] Web SSO <AuthnRequest> conformance
  - From: "Davis, Peter" <peter.davis@neustar.biz>

References:
- RE: [security-services] Web SSO <AuthnRequest> conformance
  - From: Thomas Wisniewski <Thomas.Wisniewski@entrust.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]