RE: [security-services] Additional comments on core-02

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

> If this is what was meant, does this imply that when there is a name 
> identifier, the entity that satisfies the subject confirmation cannot be 
> treated as the entity that
> the authority associates with the claims in the assertion?

That's certainly not my intent. Rob?

> I think that the relying party should be allowed to make either 
> association; when the name identifier is present.

Agree.

-- Scott