RE: [security-services] Proposed clean up on subject text

["Conor P. Cahill" <concahill@aol.com>]

Scott Cantor wrote on 11/12/2004, 12:03 PM:

 > Apart from that and the note above about what zero confirmations means
 > (obviously we should figure that out ;-) I can live with this.

+1 from me.

My $.02 is that zero confirmations means that the entity presenting the
assertion doesn't have to do anything special in order to present the
assertion.  To me that means it is a bearer token... but I probably
could be convinced otherwise.

Conor