RE: [security-services] Proposed addition to Section 3.3 of Conformance

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>]

Since a implementation may not support all, then "successfully process" could mean ignore or send fault/error. I just don't know what this will achieve.

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>

"Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>

01/05/2005 10:02 AM

To	Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
cc	"'Philpott, Robert'" <rphilpott@rsasecurity.com>, <security-services@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	RE: [security-services] Proposed addition to Section 3.3 of Conformance

> So "process" may be ignoring or sending a fault/error.

How about "successfully process"? Not in any specific deployment, just in
general.

-- Scott


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: security-services-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: security-services-help@lists.oasis-open.org