=======================================================================
SSTC
call Tue 6/7/2005 9:00 AM
- Attendance taken
- Prior minutes
approved
- Brief discussion of
tackling the agenda slightly out of order due to some members needing to
drop off the call early
- SAML Adoption Enhancement
subcommittee
- General discussion
- Rob sent the OASIS
requirements for creation of subcommittees
- Merrit will take the chair of
the new committee and has action item for the next meeting to deliver a
proposal conforming to the OASIS requirements
- Latest Errata (agenda pointed
to v7 but v8 is actually the latest)
- PE14:
- Some general
discussion, Scott and Brian agree on a high level but there may be a few
minor nits.
- Give two more
weeks for others to review
- Vote next call
- Overlap with PE5
is noted and agreement is reached that if PE14 is approved next call,
then PE5 goes away
- PE7: Still open
- PE10: Still open
- PE11: Jahan moved to approve,
Scott seconds, no additional discussion, unanimous consent
- PE11: Jahan moved to approve,
Scott seconds, no additional discussion, unanimous consent
- PE12: Scott moved to approve, Greg
seconds, no additional discussion, unanimous consent
- PE13: Jahan moved to approve, Hal
seconds, no additional discussion, unanimous consent
- PE15:
- Thomas discusses
the issue and the proposed resolution text
- Scott confirms
that the proposal fits with his original intent
- Moved to approve, second, no
additional discussion, unanimous consent
- Additional PE item
regarding a particular use case within the SSO profile
- Greg to seed with
an initial email and Scott will write up the use case, potential issues,
and possible PE text
- CD status for xpath
attribute profile
- Did not pass the
vote (12 Yes, 1 No, and 11 Abstain votes) and
will not move to CD status
- Will continue
discussion on the list and continue document updates
- CD status for x509
authn based attribute protocol profile
- Did pass the vote (25
Yes, 0 No, and 7 Abstain votes) and will (?) move to CD
status
- Significant
additional discussion – particular concern about the title implying
security that isn’t there. Also focus of the document is unclear
to some
- Rick & Rob take
an action item to work on the document
- Consider a
different name
- Address security considerations
- Status on
metadata-ext CD edits
- Eve on vacation
- Rob mentioned
that Eve has sent edited copies to Prateek, Scott Cantor, Greg Whitehead,
and Rob to review. Once that’s done that, Rob will upload the
documents.
- Latest Tech overview doc posted
- Hold discussion until next
call b/c John is absent
- Contributor list for
metadata-ext
- Tom W: Errata for NameIDPolicy
- Addressed in errata
discussion
- AuthnRequest Subject vs. NameIDPolicy usage
- Addressed in errata
discussion
- Federated
Provisioning
- Other business?
- Johan – Feature matrix change from NA -> optional re ECP in
conformance? Leave as open for now
- A question about ECP and conformance – is required for all
SP/IDP operational modes? YES
- Adjourn
|