Re: [security-services] Clarification on Action element

[Emily Xu <Emily.Xu@Sun.COM>]

Thank you Scott. It sounds like an errata item, though not many people
may use it.

Thanks,
Emily

Scott Cantor wrote On 09/28/05 09:11 PM,:
>>In section 2.7.4.2 of core spec, Namespace is marked as "Optional". It
> 
> says:
> 
>>"If this element is absent, the namespace
>>urn:oasis:names:tx:SAML:1.0:action:rwedc-negation specified in Section
>>8.1.2 is in effect."
> 
> 
> This would be pretty weird, I suspect that slipped through since nobody even
> looked at the Authz stuff.
> 
> 
>>But in the following schema definition, attribute Namespace is marked as
>>required: <attribute name="Namespace" type="anyURI" use="required"/>
> 
> 
> Then it's required. And it should be, there's no default that makes any
> sense.
> 
> -- Scott
>