[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Agenda for 31-Jan SSTC con-call
Dial in info: +1 865 673 6950; Access code: 270-9441# FYI - Spam on public comment distribution list has been
reported to OASIS and they are working on it.
--------------- #0247: As per 17-Jan call: Prateek has
received some feedback on the constrained delegation profile and will produce a
revision next week. Owner: Prateek Mishra <New AI> --------------- #0243: Clean up text in Section 3.3.2.2.1
(RequestedAuthNContext) Owner: Scott Cantor <New AI> --------------- #0246: revise the PE 10 wording proposal
"clarifying that anyURI is indeed the right interpretation" for the
Reason attribute. Owner: Jahan Moreh <New AI> --------------- #0180: Need to update SAML server trust
document Owner: 30-Aug: Jeff will not have time anytime soon to update the
draft that was posted. It was suggested that the info in the doc is useful, so
the AI is being left open in the hope that someone will volunteer in the near
future to take over as editor. --------------- #0234: Nick to prepare some text for PE
23. Owner: Nick Ragouzis --------------- #0245: Per 17-Jan con-call: Greg W. to
propose some clarifying text for the attribute profile section re: the issues
discussed on the call. Owner: Greg Whitehead <New AI> --------------- #0244: Per 17-Jan con-call: Tom W. to
send out a suggestion for shoring up the conformance language to clear up the
requester/responder mismatch. Owner: Thomas Wisniewski <New AI> --------------- #0238: Plan for red-line versions of SAML
2.0 Owner: Eve Maler Per 8-Nov con-call: Eve-supposed to research on whether this
was OK, she thinks OASIS said yes. CYA notification as to non-normative vs
normative. Just haven't found the time. Keep my name on AI with speed caveat. Scott-
I will help (if necessary) #0242: Recommended text for SAML Attr
Sharing Profile Owner: Rob Philpott --------------- #0230: SAML Conformance SSL/TLS
requirements Owner: Eric Tiffany Eric is concerned because implementation will be able to run
over TLS, but spec actually says you must implement TLS. --------------- #0240: Status of SAML 2.0 submission to
ITU T Owner: Olivier Dubuisson Per 17-Jan-06 con-call: --------------- |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]