Re: [security-services] SAML references

["Eve L. Maler" <Eve.Maler@Sun.COM>]

Okay, I've moved it up my stack.  I'll try to push it forward during 
the next two weeks.

	Eve

Colin.Wallis@ssc.govt.nz wrote:
> I second that Scott (though I'm not a voting member:-).
> 
> The folks who are reading the Tech Overview are typically new to SAML v2.0
> and some of the errors may be lost on them in any event.
> 
> But as we edge closer to implementation, the importance of the errata doc is
> getting higher.  
> 
> Cheers
> Colin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] 
> Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2006 6:55 a.m.
> To: Eve.Maler@Sun.COM; 'OASIS SSTC'
> Subject: RE: [security-services] SAML references
> 
>> That's not true anymore -- all the SAML V2.0 docs, including the 
>> individual schema files, are in docs.oasis-open.org and are intended 
>> to be totally persistent.  But we only get those URLs once the files 
>> are OASIS Standard level, I think, so it's after the fact somewhat.
> 
> Right, I was referring mainly to the Kavi links.
> 
>> In all seriousness, actually, I would rank them this way; let me know 
>> if anyone disagrees:
>>
>> Help get Tech Overview revision published Revise SSTC site Create (and 
>> maintain) spec template Redline errata draft
> 
> I can only speak for myself, I think the redline is vastly more important
> than the rest. I am fully willing to help, and I'll particularly volunteer
> to help maintain it going forward, I just don't have the cycles to take it
> all on from scratch.
> 
> -- Scott

-- 
Eve Maler                                         +1 425 947 4522
Technology Director                           eve.maler @ sun.com
CTO Business Alliances group                Sun Microsystems, Inc.