security-services message

Subject: RE: [security-services] Discussion of Future Work of the SSTC

From: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: "'Tom Scavo'" <trscavo@gmail.com>, <colin.wallis@ssc.govt.nz>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:35:02 -0400

> Yes, if we're talking about the same thing, the IdP proxy concept is
> important but underspecified.  We would be happy to help with that.

If it's underspecified, that's errata, not new work. I don't see what's not
specified about it, apart from things that are out of scope (like
authentication context mapping).

-- Scott

References:
- Re: [security-services] Discussion of Future Work of the SSTC
  - From: "Tom Scavo" <trscavo@gmail.com>