[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: comments: draft-sstc-saml-metadata-ext-query-02
> Only the "catch all" is relevant. I think they're all relevant because they clearly establish the intent of the profile in regards to that attribute. Not to mention that it explicitly *says* what the values are for both versions of SAML at the top of the profile before it even discusses the roles. > As far as I can tell, this passage says the use case I mentioned above > is undefined, and moreover, it is not defined elsewhere (in > particular, in the metadata extension spec) so it's not at all clear > (to me anyways :) what's supposed to be done in the case of V1.x > entities. There are any number of guidelines to follow for SAML 1.x in the profile, and all of them are referenced in aggregate by the extension document several times. I don't see why we should repeat the entire profile again. If someone can come up with a single possible interpretation for that attribute's content that is other than the intended one, I'm all ears. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]