Re: [security-services] Comments on Tech Overview rev 13

[Paul Madsen <paulmadsen@rogers.com>]

Hi Tom, I believe Eve agreed on the dotted-line issue.

My understanding of the consensus is that all lines are continuous, i.e. 
3 and 4 as well?

paul

Tom Scavo wrote:
> On 3/11/07, Eve L. Maler <Eve.Maler@sun.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> I personally don't think we need to hew to this rule.
>> >
>> > That's fine.  It's mostly pedagogical and not worth quibbling about in
>> > general.  I personally find this to be a useful rule when writing
>> > documentation and so forth since it leads to reasonably complete
>> > end-to-end flows that novices can understand.
>>
>> I'm game to change it -- if Paul feels like doing the graphic
>> editing!  But I don't feel it's absolutely essential unless
>> something thinks we're making it more confusing this way.
>
> I'm okay with the single "swoopy arrow" :-) but did we agree that
> steps 1 and 7 should be represented by a solid line?  That's my main
> concern.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>

-- 
Paul Madsen             e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com
NTT                     p:613-482-0432
                        m:613-302-1428
                        aim:PaulMdsn5
                        web:connectid.blogspot.com