Re: [security-services] The wiki is live

["Tom Scavo" <trscavo@gmail.com>]

Makes sense to me, Paul!

Tom

On 4/17/07, Paul Madsen <paulmadsen@rogers.com> wrote:
> agree that we should spend some time thinking about a structure before
> we start
>
> For this piece, I see a link structure something like
>
> - Wiki home (with link to Post 2.0 docs)
>     - "Post 2.0 docs"  (links to individual doc pages sorted into
> sections reflecting status)
>        - Individual doc page (text from abstract as description, links
> to PDF etc)
>
> make sense?
>
> paul
> Tom Scavo wrote:
> > I like the idea of section titles for each document stage.  This would
> > allow for a brief explanation of each stage of the process (or an
> > external link, if applicable).  However, rather than link to
> > *documents* in each section, link to *pages*, one for each document
> > stream.  (I'm assuming of course that this wiki setup allows for
> > multiple pages.)
> >
> > Popping up a level, this "Documents" page would be a second-level
> > page, linked to from the top-level wiki page, which would have links
> > to other second-level pages of interest.  Not sure what the overall
> > information structure needs to look like, though.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > On 4/17/07, SCOTT CANTOR <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote:
> >> > I personally liked a table (and was planning on changing the axes)
> >> > because it made clear what set of docs were at any one stage ...
> >> > the cost is greater complexity for editing.
> >>
> >> Changing the axis would be fine by me.
> >>
> >> > How about section titles for each stage, docs get moved up (down?)
> >> > as they progress?
> >>
> >> That would be fine also.
> >>
> >> -- Scott
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Paul Madsen             e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com
> NTT                     p:613-482-0432
>                         m:613-302-1428
>                         aim:PaulMdsn5
>                         web:connectid.blogspot.com
>
>
>