RE: [security-services] sstc-saml-approved-errata-2.0-cd-01 erratum?

["Hal Lockhart" <hlockhar@bea.com>]

Yes, let's fix it and vote on it Tuesday. Because of the Symposium, I
have not yet sent the public review request to Mary.

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eve.Maler@Sun.COM [mailto:Eve.Maler@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:21 AM
> To: 'SSTC (E-mail)'
> Subject: Re: [security-services] sstc-saml-approved-errata-2.0-cd-01
> erratum?
> 
> Whoops!  Okay, now what to do?  The AE doc is in post-CD pre-public
> review purgatory at the moment.  Should we withdraw, fix, and do a
> quick cd-02?
> 
> 	Eve
> 
> Scott Cantor wrote:
> >> But it seems pretty clear, from Section 8.3.1 of [SAMLCore] and
from
> E60
> >> of the Approved Errata, that the correct URI should be:
> >>
> >> urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified
> >
> > Yes, it is. If the format in 2.0 had the same meaning as the old, we
> left the URI alone.
> >
> > -- Scott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Eve Maler                                         +1 425 947 4522
> Technology Director                           eve.maler @ sun.com
> CTO Business Alliances group                Sun Microsystems, Inc.