Re: [security-services] CD prep tips for other editors

[Paul Madsen <paulmadsen@rogers.com>]

In a thread with OASIS's Mary on simple tidy warnings/errors, she 
stressed 'how does it look?'

I chose Tech Overview HTML based on that.

paul

Scott Cantor wrote:
>> Ah, that may explain why the filename extension (.html/.xhtml) matters
>> in your case.  Does the output file have a DOCTYPE declaration?
>>     
>
> Yes, it's valid XHTML according to the W3C. Valid doesn't mean usable.
>
>   
>> Note the 'doctype: loose' config parameter.  I tried 'doctype: strict'
>> but you don't even want to know how many validator errors that
>> produced.
>>     
>
> Well, I didn't get any errors, the SimpleTidy program gave me something
> valid, just not always something readable.
>
> I'll try the actual tidy code next time.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
>
>   

-- 
Paul Madsen             e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com
NTT                     p:613-482-0432
                        m:613-302-1428
                        aim:PaulMdsn5
                        web:connectid.blogspot.com