Re: [security-services] Comments on Tech Overview rev 13

["Tom Scavo" <trscavo@gmail.com>]

Paul, I think a dotted line should signify a step that is out of
scope.  In that case, all four of the steps you mentioned would be
represented by dotted lines, I believe.

That's my two cents worth, anyway. :-)

Tom

On 7/19/07, Paul Madsen <paulmadsen@rogers.com> wrote:
> Finally getting to my graphic editing AI
>
> The various sequence diagrams have some or all of the following message
> steps
>
> - Access Resource
> - Challenge for credentials
> - User Login
> - Supply resource
>
> Was it the agreement that the first & last are to be drawn as solid
> lines? And the middle 2 as dotted?
>
> Paul
>
> Tom Scavo wrote:
> > On 3/11/07, Eve L. Maler <Eve.Maler@sun.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> I personally don't think we need to hew to this rule.
> >> >
> >> > That's fine.  It's mostly pedagogical and not worth quibbling about in
> >> > general.  I personally find this to be a useful rule when writing
> >> > documentation and so forth since it leads to reasonably complete
> >> > end-to-end flows that novices can understand.
> >>
> >> I'm game to change it -- if Paul feels like doing the graphic
> >> editing!  But I don't feel it's absolutely essential unless
> >> something thinks we're making it more confusing this way.
> >
> > I'm okay with the single "swoopy arrow" :-) but did we agree that
> > steps 1 and 7 should be represented by a solid line?  That's my main
> > concern.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> >
>
> --
> Paul Madsen             e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com
> NTT                     p:613-482-0432
>                         m:613-302-1428
>                         aim:PaulMdsn5
>                         web:connectid.blogspot.com
>
>