[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: [saml-dev] Metadata and DNSSEC
I'm honestly not at all familiar with these RFC's but it sounds like we have a potential erratum item? -----Original Message----- From: Peter Davis [mailto:peter.davis@neustar.biz] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 3:10 PM To: Scott Cantor; 'Josh Howlett'; saml-dev Subject: Re: [saml-dev] Metadata and DNSSEC We should publish errata for SAMLMeta2.0 on this. I've read through the updated RFC's (4033-5)... Only 4035 applies wrt SAMLMeta, and, since SAMLMeta does not introduce any new requirements on signed zones or resolves, it should be a simple s/2535/4035/g operation. =peterd On 8/9/2007 11:10 AM, "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote: >> RFC2535 was obseleted by RFCs 4033-5 (one month after the publication >> of SAMLMeta2). Can anyone clarify what, if any, consideration has >> been given to this? > > Zero. The section was copied with minimal, if any, changes from ID-FF. > > -- Scott > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: saml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: saml-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org > =peterd ( http://xri.net/=peterd ) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: saml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: saml-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]