[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Proposed Agenda SSTC Concall, September 25, 2007
On 9/25/07, Hal Lockhart <hlockhar@bea.com> wrote: > > 3.2 Docs pending public review > > Pending 15 Day Review > *SAML V2.0 Attribute Sharing Profile for X.509 Authentication-Based > Systems (CD 04) > > The following are needed. > > 1. The dates of the original 60-day review, including a link to the > announcement http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200605/msg00001.html > 2. The comment resolution log of any reported issues > > 3. A change-marked copy of the spec noting the differences from the > version submitted for the 60-day public review. This document went through five (5) working drafts between CD-02 and CD-03, so a diff would be meaningless. I wonder if we should we submit this document for 60-day public review instead of 15-day public review? The wiki has been updated with more information about this document: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SstcSamlX509AuthnAttribProfile > Pending 60 Day Review > *SAML V2.0 Deployment Profiles for X.509 Subjects (CD 02) > > Need work on conformance sections: > > SAML V2.0 Attribute Sharing Profile for X.509 Authentication-Based > Systems - contains no conformance section Yes it does. Please see section 5 of CD-02: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SstcSaml2X509ProfilesDeploy Thanks, Tom
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]