[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Proposed Agenda SSTC Concall, September 25, 2007
I am also at the workshop, but intend to chair the call anyway. Perhaps we can find a quiet spot. Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 1:37 AM > To: security-services@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [security-services] Proposed Agenda SSTC Concall, September > 25, 2007 > > I'm going to be at the XMLSig workship, so will miss the call. > > > SAMLv2.0 HTTP POST "SimpleSign" Binding - contains an inadequate > > conformance > > section: > > "A specification that is approved by the TC at the Public Review Draft, > > Committee Specification or OASIS Standard level must include a separate > > section, listing a set of numbered conformance clauses, to which any > > implementation of the specification must adhere in order to claim > > conformance to the specification (or any optional portion thereof)." > > Given that there is no indication of what was wrong with it...I'm not > clear > on what I'm being asked to write. > > Is there an example somewhere? This is one document, one set of rules, > it's > all or nothing. I didn't know how to write it to satisfy them, so I'd > suggest perhaps somebody who does supply the text. > > -- Scott >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]